Monday, April 20, 2015

MASH By Justin, Amir, and Doug

     M*A*S*H was released in March 1970. The film was directed by Robert Altman and written by Ring Lardner Jr, who interestingly, was a member of the Hollywood Ten and blacklisted by the HUAC Committee; the ban was lifted in 1965 when he wrote the Cincinnati Kid. The film was portrayed as a black satirical comedy and had an estimated budget of $3.5 million; it grossed $81.6 million in the United States. Several notable actors and actresses held prominent roles in the film including Donald Sutherland, Elliot Gould, Tom Skeritt, Sally Kellerman, Robert Duvall, and Gary Burghoff. Only Burghoff and George Wood reprised their roles as Corporal ‘Radar’ O’Reilly and General Hammond on the television series, which ran from 1972-1983. The film focuses on a group of Mobile Army Surgical Hospital officers as they perform surgery just miles from the Korean Conflict. They poke fun at the Korean Conflict by not caring about their work. Additionally, they make fun of the war, joke about death and religion, behave inappropriately, and chaos is always constant in the camp. Selected to the National Film Registry, M*A*S*H was considered to be culturally significant because it made fun of the Korean Conflict even though it was about Vietnam. Additionally, the film also poked fun at religion and death, pillars that the United States held in high regard during this period.
     Robert Altman’s successful film, MASH, is praised for its well-done satirical outlook on the Vietnam War. Using the Korean War as a cloak over its direct criticism of the Vietnam War, MASH is a comedic commentary on the absurdity of war. The men of the 4077th Mobile Army Surgical Hospital appose authority and conformity whenever possible. The film was an achievement due to its groundbreaking take on American Warfare. It was one of the first American films to criticize war and religion, two staples of the American identity during the Cold War era. The idolized protagonists, Hawkeye, Duke and Trapper’s, complete disregard for their superiors and army laws were far from common place in a war film. Not only that, but the two characters, Burns and Houlihan, that sought for conformity and order in the army camp were ostracized and ridiculed. Serious topics like religion, war, death, gore and infidelity were handled with little care and blatantly painted in a comical light. Americans, especially during the Cold War era, took war very seriously and to have a film so successful outwardly mocking war was telling. Altman’s film showed the growing opposition of conformity, violence and authority in the 1960’s. This film was so important because it gave the unorthodox a voice and shied away from the black and white picture the early Cold War painted for the American people.
     There were three major connections to classThe first connection dealt with The Tragedy of American Diplomacy.  Williams believed that America invaded foreign countries in order to spread their dominance rather than to help democratize the country.  This is significant to MASH because it is interesting that a movie created around the same time as the Vietnam War does not make much mention of Anti-war sentiments but rather it tries to avoid the subject.  This could be due to the American public beginning to share Williams’ view of America spreading an empire rather than helping others.  The next subject covered was the making fun of the military bureaucracy.  Colonel Blake and General Hammond both seem disinterested in their respective posts and actually rather incompetent at performing their duties.  This is comparable to the movie Dr. Strangelove, where the government officials are all rather incompetent as well. 
The last connection dealt with the small subtle hints at Anti-War sentiment.  There were three situations of this.  The first of which dealt with a conversation between Hot Lips and Trapper John.  It is significant because it’s the first time there is any real mention of the war affecting the soldiers.  The second hint was when Ho-Jon went for his physical and Hawkeye, we assume, actively tried to keep him out of the army.  The last hint was when Hawkeye and Duke get their discharge papers and get out of the base as fast as they can, Duke tried to leave before finishing a surgery.
The film clip we used was when Painless tries to commit suicide.  We believed that this best represented the overall feel of the movie, and gave the class a glimpse at the type of things the camp would do to keep their minds occupied.
We asked the question, “Why did this movie seem to ignore, or brush aside, the fact that they were at war?”  The class discussed how this may have been because of the overall feel the public had for Vietnam.  We also discussed how although there may have been discontent for the war, it was still not okay for a film to talk bad about a war they were currently engaged in.

Destructing MASH (1970)

What's the big Deal? MASH (1970) BY: Eric D. Snider

MASH (`1970) BY: Roger Greenspun

1.      Dr. Strangelove

2.      MASH film

3.      Williams, William Appleman. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy. Rev. and Enl. ed. New York: Dell Pub., 1962. Print.

Friday, April 3, 2015

Guess Who's Coming to Dinner

Guess Who's Coming to Dinner
By: Kevin Schechterly and Rosie Davidson

Guess Who's Coming to Dinner poster.jpg

Guess Who’s Coming to dinner, was released in 1967. Starring in the movie was Katharine Hepburn, Katharine Houghton, Spencer Tracy, and prominent African American actor Sydney Poitier. Sidney Poitier was the most famed actor/actress in the movie, with this being his third box office hit in three months.  The movie tackles the issue of interracial relationships through a white woman and a black man who met in Hawaii and want to get married but want their parents’ approval.  Initially the parents are not on board but as the movie three out of the four parents are all for the marriage.  For obvious reasons it was a controversial for the time but also went against the norm and had an optimistic outcome.  The movie’s budget was $4 million dollars.  It grossed over $70 million globally.
Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was a revolutionary movie for its time as due to its main theme addressing racial tensions and interracial couples. The movie was very optimistic for its time because racism was so deeply engrained in American society but in the movie, Matt Drayton’s racism and disdain for interracial marriages was overcome in a matter of one evening. In class we have been talking about racism in America and the Civil Rights movement. This movie pertains to class because of the racism that had to be overcome to proceed with the marriage. Also, it breaks the norms of the day because interracial couples were not common and were not even legal in a number of states.
            In the discussion that followed our question there was agreement upon the reason the movie never mentioned specifically what problems Matt Drayton had with the interracial marriage. The two people that we called on referred to the audience’s point of view and that the producers would not want to alienate potentially racist viewers. The movie was made to try and shed some light on interracial marriages and that they are not bad but they had to do so carefully to avoid coming on too strong and losing possible listeners or believers.